Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
MEDIAWATCH: End of the road for cluster bombs?
15 Feb 2008 14:46:00 GMT
Written by: Joanne Tomkinson
An ethnic Albanian walks near mine field in the National Park of Kosovo's capital Pristina. REUTERS/Hazir Reka HR/
An ethnic Albanian walks near mine field in the National Park of Kosovo's capital Pristina. REUTERS/Hazir Reka HR/

On Feb. 18 governments and campaigners from around the world will meet in New Zealand to discuss a treaty banning cluster bombs. Activists and survivors at the gathering hope it will result in a ban on cluster munitions, which they say have a devastating effect on civilians.

"(Cluster bombs are) failing on a massive scale," according to the online news website of Voice of America.

Tens of thousands of people have been killed and maimed by cluster bombs during the past 40 years, and they kill many more people after a war than during it, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) told Voice of America.

"Large numbers of people are being killed year after year, decade after decade from the use of a weapon, which is inaccurate, unreliable and used in massive numbers," Peter Herby, head of ICRC's arms unit, said.

When dropped, each bomb disperses from 10 to several hundred bomblets randomly over a wide area. This makes them very hard to target, and many lie undetonated on the ground for years, often disturbed by civilians after the conflict has ended.

Cluster munitions have been used in conflicts including Afghanistan, Vietnam, the Balkans, and in the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah militants in southern Lebanon.

Rasha Zayoun was 17 years old when an Israeli cluster bomblet exploded in her home in southern Lebanon, the Washington Post writes. Her left foot had to be amputated, and her remaining foot is so speckled with shrapnel and stiff from lack of use that, confined to a wheelchair, she's in almost constant pain.

She found the unexploded bomblet in a bag of wild thyme her father brought home. "I thought it was a toy", she said.

U.N. officials estimate that the Israeli military dropped between 1.2 and 4 million cluster bomblets on southern Lebanon in the summer of 2006, according to the Washington Post.

There are a lot of stories like Rasha's around.

Twenty-one-year-old Umarbek Pulodov from Tajikistan lost an eye when cluster bombs were dropped on his village in 1992. He told the New York Times he considered himself lucky - his older brother and uncle were killed.

"My message is simple - ban cluster bombs, clear them and help survivors and their families," Pulodov said.

And Inter Press Service (IPS) tells the story of Branislav Kapetanovic, a former member of the Serbian army who lost both his arms and legs in an accident in 2000 while he was trying to clear cluster bombs dropped by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) the previous year. His hearing was also damaged, and he was blinded for several months.

"These weapons are monstrous, and they cannot be controlled," he said to the IPS. "A total ban is the only way to go. No exceptions, no excuses."

This week's meeting is part of the so-called Oslo Process, a union of governments and humanitarian organisations such as the Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC), a network of about some 250 NGOs working in 70 countries. They are aiming for an international accord banning these weapons by the end of 2008.

Though nearly 100 countries support the Oslo Process, some governments like the United States aren't supportive of a total ban. Others like France, Germany and Italy are trying to water down the treaty, the CMC has said to Reuters.

The U.S. supports the use of cluster bombs if used and defused properly, and says efforts should focus on ensuring countries know how to use the weapons in a way that is in full accordance with international humanitarian law, according to the BBC.

The ICRC's Herby told Voice of America: "The bottom line is that there is a potential for an extremely severe humanitarian problem caused by the increased possession, proliferation and use of these weapons by more and more actors."

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

4 responses to “MEDIAWATCH: End of the road for cluster bombs?”

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
  1. betty hancock says:

    Thank you for alerting me about the horrendous results from the use of cluster bombs;news of which is not reported in mass media.I will bring this to the attention of family and friends and wear a homemade pin saying "Ban Cluster Bombs" whenever I go out in public;also contact my representatives in the federal[U.S.A.] government,and urge them to bring this tragedy to the attention of Congress.Meanwhile,I will continue to pray for all those who suffer in the world.

  2. b trerice says:

    Another frame of reference: I long for the day when global citizens regardless of their nationality and geographic location can vote on these bans and other international policies in the making. When millions of people world wide protest in 800 cities across this globe against the invasion of Iraq informs me that there is an 'Earth/Peace Nation' immerging and coalescing.

    The decision makers of nations who do not want to ban totally such hideous and barbaric weaponry as cluster bombs are, in my opinion, basically a multi-national self-interest group. It is time to separate the chaff from the wheat. They are individuals and they all have names. Further I would like to see their names reported when their countries are named.

  3. B.D.S. says:

    It should be noted that cluster bombs came into wide use as a replacement for napalm. Applying the argument against cluster bombs, one will find that napalm is actually the *superior* weapon: undetonated bomblets persist, while napalm burns off.

    If cluster bombs are somehow banned, some other area-effect weapon will take their place. Activists would better use their time devising policy that does not require the use of area-effect weapons than agitating for one particular example thereof to be taken out of inventory.

  4. MARTA says:

    I understand the USA is suppose to be for Peace, so how can they support the use of CLUSTER BOMBS???

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.


Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Tue Dec 1 19:15:41 2009