Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
Pakistan: The Real Price of Eleven Billion Dollars
17 Feb 2009 23:19:00 GMT
Written by: Refugees International
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.
Photo courtesy of Refugees International.
Photo courtesy of Refugees International.

Since September 11, 2001, the U.S. government has provided Pakistan with $11 billion in military aid, a staggering sum in both absolute terms and when compared with non-military assistance. Not surprisingly, Pakistan wants this financial and logistical support to its armed forces to continue. President Asif Ali Zardari, in a recent Washington Post op-ed, urged the U.S. to “give [Pakistan] the necessary resources – upgrading [their] equipment and providing the newest technology – to fight terrorists…”

With Ambassador Holbrooke set to return shortly from his visit to the region, President Obama will soon be expected to craft clear policy priorities for Pakistan. There will be no shortage of data for him to review. Yet alongside the billions in military aid, there’s another set of figures the Obama administration should consider.

Last week the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) revealed that up to 450,000 Pakistanis have been displaced because of conflict in the northwest. Of these, more than 65,000 live in tents in newly created camps. The UN expects the total figure to rise to 600,000 in the coming weeks.

In the last six months, the Pakistani army has intensified military operations in the North West Frontier Province and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas against anti-government militants. These military operations include bombings of villages and have resulted in large scale displacement, civilian deaths and property losses.

This week’s news of a ceasefire in the Swat valley and the enforcement of Islamic law is an indication of the weak hold that government institutions have in this part of the country. Civilians are caught between insurgents and the army, and often have no choice but to flee their homes, leaving everything behind.


The U.S. government has remained silent on this issue. While it has disbursed some funds to respond to the immediate needs of the displaced through the UN and the Red Cross, few senior officials (in both past and present administrations) have expressed U.S. concerns over the fate of Pakistani civilians. The U.S. cannot shirk away from its responsibilities. It has financed, encouraged and support the Pakistani government to root out militants on its Afghanistan border. 


 Pakistanis know that the bombs that are being dropped are American made, and as Refugees International argued in our recent report, the Pakistani government is quickly losing the support of its population.
President Obama has shown he understands the need to publicly reach out to outside constituents. His administration must demonstrate a commitment to the protection of the Pakistanis through both humanitarian assistance and the promotion of civilian protection principles. President Obama should encourage the Pakistani government to take all possible measures to ensure that civilian casualties are minimized, and that adequate assistance is reaching the displaced.

This is not only a moral imperative, but an acknowledgment of U.S. responsibilities in this conflict. Eleven billion dollars come at a price.

Patrick Duplat

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

2 responses to “Pakistan: The Real Price of Eleven Billion Dollars ”

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
  1. Muthyavan. says:

    Pakistan Internal politics has reached a very dangerous point with three local division working one against other. All these three sections were responsible for the rule of Pakistan for the last thirty years and the present situation is exactly the same as in the old united Pakistan before it was divided into Bangladesh and Pakistan. All these three sections during their rule have allowed extreme religious activities to florist with a view of making problems to the neighbouring countries. Now with its growth to a mighty power supported by out side forces it is threatening the rights of Pakistan to remain as a united peaceful country.

  2. Muthyavan. says:

    Pakistan Internal politics has reached a very dangerous point with three local division working one against other. All these three sections were responsible for the rule of Pakistan for the last thirty years and the present situation is exactly the same as in the old united Pakistan before it was divided into Bangladesh and Pakistan. All these three sections during their rule have allowed extreme religious activities to florist with a view of making problems to the neighbouring countries. Now with its growth to a mighty power supported by out side forces it is threatening the rights of Pakistan to remain as a united peaceful country.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content in this article, including by framing or by similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.

Refugees International, a U.S-based aid agency, generates lifesaving humanitarian assistance and protection for displaced people around the world, and works to end the conditions that create displacement. The organisation was founded in 1979.

Latest bloggers

More bloggers
Kazakhstan: Ban on Scientology Church

Tajikistan: A perilous state

MENA: Is the BBC Impartial in its Refusal to Air the Gaza Appeal?

China: Eluding Cat Kills himself in Jail

Ukraine: The Plight of Irina Gavrisheva



Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Wed Feb 18 17:07:07 2009